It is a meld between many philosophies. Cameronism and Libertarianism stand at the forefront but it is truly a unique philosophy with a caste system and a monarchy.
Cameronism
Cameronism became a term based on the politics of David Cameron. David Cameron was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 2010 – 2016. Let’s take a closer look at his politics.
His politics are described as Neo-Liberal. Communitarianism is a better description.
“The idea of the Big Society, championed by Cameron under the 2010 coalition government, proposes “integrating the free market with a theory of social solidarity based on hierarchy and voluntarism” drawing upon “a mix of conservative communitarianism and libertarian paternalism” in principle.”
https://www.youtube.com/embed/WGCvjSpt5wk?feature=oembedDavid Cameron
This interview led to Boris Johnson campaigning for BREXIT and changed British politics.
What is Communitarianism and how does fuel today’s Neo-Liberal movements.?
In the past, we saw many countries embracing Marxism. These philosophies creates various Communist governments world-wide. The longest surviving Communist government is China with over 60 years of Communism.
Communism lacks private ownership. The state owns everything including your body.
Communism was about equality where no one had an advantage over another. What does Communism have to do with Communitarianism?
Communitarianism is about equity but still remains on the hinges of Marxist philosophy. There is no private ownership or individual rights in a communitarian system.
Kamala Harris remain a big proponent of Communitarianism and Equity policy as you can see in the video below.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/u-4kdpDM2IU?feature=oembedKamala Harris on Equity
Equity states that not everyone will start out at the same place but will end up at the same place. Some groups may be elevated while other groups will lose their wealth to state confiscation to be brought down to a level where equality can reign supreme. Eventually the wealth redistribution scheme will place everyone on the same level just as Communist equality does.
The video below describes equity in ways that people can understand. Let’s have a closer look.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/DdmOxqAonx4?feature=oembedCommunitarianism and the importance of Community
Communitarianism is more concerned about the Community than you as an individual or your individual rights. The community always takes precedent. When you are part of a Communitarian community, you are viewed as part of a hive mind.
Libertarianism
Libertarianism is the basis for most institutions, government, and charities in the Western world. Andrew Carnegie created the public library system in Pittsburgh as his way of giving back to the people that worked so hard to make Capitalism work for the capitalists.
This system has prevailed for a very long time with philanthropists creating an agenda they believe will help the common people.
Although Libertarians are staunch capitalists, they tend to be extremely liberal on social issues and support common people in their quests for individuality. What does this look like in the real world and how does it differ from Democratic philosophy.
A Democrat wants to get a sex change based on the idea of trend, media, and agenda, which is not necessarily theirs.
A Libertarian wants you to have the right to get that sex change based on the philosophy that you are an individual who decides for himself/herself.
Modern Technocracy
We see shades of BREXIT, shades of China, shades of Cambodia and even Gadaffi’s Lybia with Dark Enlightenment in conjunction with Technocracy.
This philosophy dictates that Communitarianism (communist community) dictates for the whole. It also challenges Communitarianism in that not every person is created equal or has the capacity for equal opportunity.
This creates a caste system that is not necessarily built on IQ per se, but looks at certain races as inferior such as blacks.
Curtis Yarvin is a big proponent of this philosophy and many of the writing supporting have been written by him.
Who is Curtis Yarvin?
“Curtis Yarvin began constructing the basis of the ideology of dark enlightenment in the late 2000s, with Nick Land elaborating and coining the term “Dark Enlightenment”. The movement has also had contributions from figures such as venture capitalist Peter Thiel. Despite criticism, the movement has gained traction with parts of Silicon Valley as well as several political figures associated with United States President Donald Trump, including political strategist Steve Bannon, Vice President JD Vance, and Michael Anton.”
It is interesting to that many of these names center around Elon Musk.
Let’s take a closer look at Neo-Reactionary philosophy.
Neo-reactionary looks like a hodge lodge of seemingly disconnected ideas all smashed into something that creates a philosophy that actually adds in a zombie apocalypse.
Why not add in reptilians, aliens, and space wars for fun? I’m too off-base when I say this. There is an element of fantasy gaming that is driven by transhumanism. Sometimes, it is difficult to differentiate between fantasy and reality.
They have even created a card game that mimics the game, “Magic”.
Mencius Moldbug is Curtis Yarvin’s character.
More on Technocracy and Neo-Reactionary Philosophy.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Hw7ZAKpSDWI?feature=oembedNeo-Reactionary Philosophy
It is difficult to meld such two opposing philosophies in order to make communitarianism and equity work. We can see if the graph below where the opposing philosophies occur and how Communitarianism falls right in between.
I do not see any way to reconcile the extreme left with the extreme right. Libertarianism was always the answer as it allowed for individuality without compromise, unless you committed a crime. Attempting to meld such extremes only creates war and hatred for the groups in your particular community.
This has caused a war on levels most ordinary people do not understand. Let’s have a closer look.
- Contradictory philosophies about technology and transhumanism.
Technology went on high speed starting in the 1980’s we not only saw the advent of the digital world, but have witnessed fast-track innovation unlike ever seen before in human history.
Transhumanism should have been kept simple, non-invasive or minimally invasive and non-gene edited. It is too late to talk about what should’ve been. It is a done deal and humanity is cooked literally.
Gene editing brought in a 70 percent reduction in fertility rates and a shorter life-span. Will there be survivors? There always seem to be survivors. Now I sound like a neo-reactionary but in reality, I’m simply a realist. No fantasy land here.
Angel funds led to this entire debacle with stiff competition between technology companies for the next best and great technology. Somehow, the idea of benefiting humanity got swept to the wayside.
These technology games between tech companies have become so vicious that people are dying and not from gene-editing.
2 World government and the use of transhumanism in conjunction with the AI Brain Initiative.
Barack Obama was the president that put the most into the Brain Initiative. What researchers found was that gene-editing in conjunction with hive-mind gave researchers the ability to not only control the dialogue, but control the person.
Obama was a Communist in College in Hawaii and grew up in Malaysia where Marxist ideals permeated almost every sector of society.
Communitarianism was an easy jump from Communist and an east sell to globalists who had no idea how to handle a banking system multi-trillions in debt.
It seemed to be an easy street of confiscation of private banks, private assets and a great reset to fix the very issues they benefited from.
World government jumped on board easily as not only a solution to western problems but a way to usher in true globalism with Chinese control.
3. Thé division between the East and the West and how reconciliatory policies attempt to bring the two together.
As illustrated above, globalists have planned a great reset to shore up the global monetary system and usher in a world government with more control over the average citizen of any country.
The West is not only resilient but fighting for its very existence including family, traditions, and history.
There is a disparity between the wealth of the West as compared to the wealth of the East. Bringing poor nations up to standard requires the West to lose their standard of living. This is not necessarily true but this is the way globalists see a solution to the problem.
BRICS is selective when accepting countries because it is an investment of China and Russia to not only profit but to bring up third world countries. The only problem most of these countries are having issues with is a work day for a pay check. Most average people are used to living extremely poor either the bare minimum.
Angry people from the third world hate the West and giving them access to Westerners only places the westerner’s life in jeopardy. They blame anyone from the West for policies most of us average westerners had very little to no control over. Add in unabated migration and westerners are suffering at the hands of haters their own politicians opened the door for. Again, the commoner is forced to suffer for policies they had no control over.
4. The Meglomaniacs of the world are vying for absolute power.
From illegal immigration, reparations to bank bailouts, the west quickly became a target for asset liquidation to fuel the new globalist mind control China driven system.
Every leader, every president’s child, every second class monarch seethed for a chance to rule the new system. Thirteen new families were chosen in which all thirteen will probably not make it through Gene-editing. Chaos will ensue in no time at all as these chosen for the dark enlightenment neoreactionist Monarchy will not survive.
Equity dictates that everyone will end up in the same place. This includes social status, race, philosophy, politics etc. Add in dark enlightenment and modern technocracy and it amounts to nothing more than tyranny with a Monarch class. I believe Cambodia was the testing grounds for such madness. Cambodia is considered Communist but they have a royal class.
This is where Communitarianism and equity take a dark turn into obvious disparity of the classes embracing a caste system over total equity, hence how dark enlightenment has altered the Communitarianism and equity stage.
The filth is obvious. The average Cambodian lives on $1.25 a day. Starvation is a common problem. What is Cambodia’s royal class doing to help the extreme impoverished?
This could be considered the misery dark enlightenment seeks as the contrast is so stark it makes most of wonder why it even exists in conjunction with each other.
Let’s ignore the monarchy for a moment and ask the simple question, “How is Cambodia benefiting from Communism?”
It’s seems like a testing ground for modern philosophies that have disastrous results.
The United States looks like the real testing grounds for Dark Enlightenment and Communitarianism.
